Game Your Yield
GMYLD is a protocol that releases staking rewards through games, not through
passive
APY. Rewards are distributed in seasons with a fixed budget and a limited number of accepted
players.
What GMYLD is
- A season-based staking protocol with a finite reward budget per season
- A modular platform where different games plug into the same yield engine
- A framework for daily participation-based reward release
- A design focused on repeat engagement, not "set and forget"
What GMYLD is not
- Stake once, farm forever
- Unlimited emissions
- A replacement for trading
The Daily Loop
Each day, the protocol opens a Daily Pot — a capped amount of rewards for that day.
Players
stake tokens, participate in a game module, and receive a reward based on their result, loyalty, and
stake
size, paid from that Daily Pot.
Modular Architecture
GMYLD is a protocol, not a single game. Each game module is a separate experience that
implements the GMYLD framework in its own way.
The Protocol Provides
- Seasons with fixed budgets and player caps
- Daily Pot mechanics
- A loyalty system that rewards stake stability
- Staking rules and exit fairness
- Referral infrastructure
- The GMYLD token as the shared medium
Each Game Module Defines
- Gameplay mechanics, encounter types, and player experience
- Reward tier system (tiers, names, percentages)
- Reward distribution mode (pot-based, PvP, cooperative, hybrid)
- Loyalty milestones, caps, and bonuses
- Difficulty scaling and progression
PumpCat is the first module. Each new game increases demand for the token
without
increasing supply.
Third-Party Integration
GMYLD is an open platform. Third-party developers can build game modules that plug
into the
protocol — provided they use GMYLD as the staking token, output a gameplay result that maps to a
release rate,
and pass integration review.
Tokenomics
Total supply: 100,000,000 GMYLD · Fixed, never increases · Launch price: $0.01
Allocation
| Bucket |
Tokens |
% |
Purpose |
| Rewards Reserve |
80,000,000 |
80% |
Season budgets, daily pots, game rewards |
| Liquidity Pairing |
10,000,000 |
10% |
Paired with USDC, protocol-owned LP |
| Market
Ops |
10,000,000 |
10% |
Collect USDC during demand spikes |
Buy-to-Stake Rule
No OTC allocations. To stake, you buy from the DEX pool, then stake. Everyone enters
through
the same door.
Burn Mechanic
Burning functions as leveraged staking. Instead of locking a large amount, a player
can burn a
smaller amount and receive the same release effect as a much larger staked position.
Example: Burn 10 tokens =
equivalent to
staking 1,000 tokens for release calculations (10 × 100 multiplier). Staking is conservative — you
keep your
tokens. Burning is aggressive — permanent destruction, far less capital required for same yield
outcome.
How Liquidity Grows
When hype buyers purchase aggressively but don't stake, the protocol can sell from
Market
Operations Inventory into that demand to collect USDC, then pair with Liquidity Pairing Inventory to
add
locked, protocol-owned liquidity. Speculation funds the protocol's infrastructure without diluting
stakers.
Seasons
Seasons are the core time unit of GMYLD. Each season has a limited number of accepted
users, a
fixed duration, and a fixed Season Fund drawn from the Rewards Reserve.
Season Entry
- Free access (FIFO): First in, first accepted until base capacity is full
- Season Codes: Optional access codes if enabled for that season
- Referral invites: Can exceed base capacity — each accepted user can invite
others
Daily Pot Mechanics
Each day the protocol opens a Daily Pot — the maximum that can be distributed that
day. The
pot adapts based on demand.
- Starts from a base pot size
- Expands in controlled steps when demand is high
- Shrinks in controlled steps when demand is low
- Can never exceed the remaining Season Fund
Staking Rules
- New deposits locked for a protocol-defined period (e.g. 72 hours)
- Each season defines a minimum stake — falling below counts as an inactive day
- Consecutive inactive days beyond threshold = removal from season (no more rewards, withdrawals
still
available)
Configurable Per Season
Base capacity, access codes, invite limits, minimum stake, season fund size, lock
period,
referral percentages, per-wallet daily caps, exit fairness thresholds, and active game modules.
The Daily Loop
You don't "claim APY." You participate in a game module and earn a result.
That result
determines how much you can release from the Daily Pot.
How It Works
- Each game module defines its own tier or scoring system
- The protocol does not prescribe tiers, names, or percentages — only that gameplay outputs a
result mapping
to a release rate
- Release is paid from the Daily Pot
- Some games use simple tiers (low/mid/high); others use PvP, scoring, or cooperative outcomes
Referrals
Referral rewards are paid from within the protocol share — not from the player's
payout and
not from the season budget. Direct referrers earn a percentage of referred user's gross release;
second-level
referrers earn a smaller percentage. Both are defined per season and per game.
Protocol Revenue
- Protocol share on releases: Primary revenue — percentage from every release
- PvP wagering fees: Configurable fee from each match or pot
- Third-party terms: Revenue sharing between game developer and protocol
All protocol revenue is directed toward
liquidity,
season runway, or predefined protocol-support paths — never team profit.
Loyalty System
Loyalty rewards stake stability over time. Higher loyalty always improves
outcomes —
this guarantee is enforced at the protocol level.
Core Principles
- Loyalty increases when you keep your stake stable across consecutive days
- Each game module defines its own loyalty cap, milestone schedule, and bonuses
- Adding new stake can lower loyalty — the new portion starts fresh
- Loyalty milestones progressively improve earning potential
Protocol Guarantees
- Loyalty is tracked per-wallet, per-game
- Cannot be transferred, faked, or retroactively applied
- Higher loyalty always improves outcomes vs lower loyalty at the same tier
- Game modules cannot design loyalty that punishes long-term stakers
Reward Distribution
Different game modules may distribute Daily Pot rewards in different ways.
Distribution Modes
- Pot-based: Rewards from Daily Pot based on gameplay results — first-come,
proportional,
or tiered
- PvP wagering: Players compete directly; winners earn from losers. Protocol
takes a
configurable fee
- Cooperative: Players work toward shared objectives; rewards based on collective
outcomes
- Hybrid: Daily pot for base rewards + PvP for bonus rewards
The protocol enforces the pot cap and per-wallet limits regardless of the
distribution
mode chosen by the game module.
Exit Fairness Rules
⚠️
Important: Read
this before staking. GMYLD is designed for seasonal reward release — exits have fairness rules
during extreme
price moves.
Reference Cost
Each wallet has one blended Reference Cost for its active stake. New deposits update
the
blended entry price, with larger deposits influencing it more.
Normal Exits
Withdrawals are available after the lock period ends (e.g. 72 hours minimum). There
are no
restrictions during normal price conditions.
If Price Is Far Above Your Entry
If market price is meaningfully above your Reference Cost, withdrawals may be limited
to
roughly the entry value you originally put in. Any difference can be forfeited into protocol-support
allocations.
Where Forfeited Value Goes
- Liquidity strengthening
- Future season runway
- Redistribution systems (if enabled)
This rule exists to keep staking aligned
with
seasonal yield release while still allowing exits. It is not a fee — forfeited value goes to the
protocol, not
the team.
Glossary
| Term |
Definition |
| Season Fund |
The season's total reward budget, drawn from the Rewards Reserve |
| Daily Pot |
The maximum reward amount that can be distributed on a given day |
| Eligible wallet |
A wallet meeting the minimum stake requirement that has not been removed |
| Loyalty |
A per-wallet, per-game stake stability score that improves earning potential |
| Module |
A game that implements the GMYLD protocol framework |
| Reference Cost |
Your blended entry price used for exit fairness calculations |
| Burn leverage |
Burning tokens to produce the same release effect as staking a much larger amount |
| Protocol share |
A percentage taken from every reward release, defined per game module |
| Reward distribution mode |
The method a game uses to split the Daily Pot among players |
| Protocol-support path |
A predefined destination for protocol revenue (liquidity, season runway, etc.) |
GMYLD as a Playing Field for Autonomous Agents
The AI agent ecosystem has a supply problem. Infrastructure, frameworks, and tooling are shipping
faster than
the number of meaningful economic surfaces agents can actually interact with — and new agents, new
frameworks,
and new capabilities arrive every week. But fast-moving doesn't mean complete. Most agent
deployments today
still operate on relatively static surfaces: deposit here, withdraw there, follow this wallet. The
full
decision-making capacity these agents have is underused, and the environments they plug into —
passive
staking, simple swaps — don't ask much of them. Compared to that, active yield mechanics are both
more
interesting and more exposed to risk, which is exactly why the design of the surface matters.
What Agents Can Do Here
Every decision in GMYLD reduces to an observable state and a set of actions: monitor pot
size,
evaluate participation levels, assess risk of entry, decide when to stake more or hold. These are
exactly the
kinds of loops agents are built for. An agent with wallet access can maintain a staking position,
protect
loyalty streaks across seasons, time entries into daily pots based on participation levels and pot
size, and
manage in-game spending across module economies — items, upgrades, and mechanics that affect yield
release —
without any human intervention.
It's also worth noting that agents don't need human direction to participate here. A
sufficiently configured agent can discover the protocol, evaluate the mechanics, enter a season, and
manage a
position from start to finish without a human ever touching the interface. The games are designed
for people,
but nothing about them requires one.
In-game economies across GMYLD modules will also include items, upgrades, and spending
mechanics. Agents are ideal consumers of these — they can optimize spend-to-yield ratios in ways
human players
rarely do consistently, making them natural participants in the deeper layers of each module's
economy.
Bidirectional Signals: Agents Follow Humans, Humans Follow Agents
One of the more interesting dynamics we're building toward is the signal layer. A human
player
with a strong seasonal performance history becomes a signal worth observing — an agent can mirror
that
strategy, or use it as one input in a broader model. A high-performing agent becomes a delegation
target — a
human with capital but limited time to play can instruct an agent to participate on their behalf,
collect
yield, manage loyalty, and report back.
This creates a two-way market: experienced human players gain value as data sources.
Consistent
agents become infrastructure for passive participants who want yield exposure without active
management.
Neither replaces the other — they coexist and amplify each other's value. People could follow agents
the same
way they follow traders — and agents could request access to human tactics the same way copy-trading
platforms
work today.
Who This Opens the Protocol To
The honest target here is people who have funds and want yield but don't want to manage
a daily
game. Right now that person has two options: passive staking with shrinking APY, or sitting out
entirely. With
agent delegation, they get a third path — set a risk profile, point an agent at the protocol, and
participate
in active yield mechanics without touching the interface. The agent plays. The owner benefits. The
protocol
gets a participant who is consistent and capital-efficient.
AI agents already trade across CEXs and DEXs, take positions in prediction markets,
follow
on-chain signals, copy successful wallets, and manage yield portfolios. The tooling exists. What
GMYLD offers
is an active economic surface — not passive deposit mechanics, but real decisions with real stakes
that
benefit from intelligent, consistent play. That's a genuinely underserved niche for agents that
already exist
and are looking for more to do.
What We're Building Toward
We plan to expose GMYLD's state and action surface in a format built for programmatic
consumption — structured state feeds, action schemas, and a simulation environment for testing
strategies
against historical season data before deploying real capital. We're also planning an opt-in agent
leaderboard:
separate from human rankings, transparent, and visible to anyone tracking autonomous strategy
performance
across seasons.
The protocol works without any of this — human players from day one, no agent
dependency. The
agent layer is additive. But the fit between active yield mechanics and autonomous decision-making
is real,
and the market of agents looking for economic surfaces worth plugging into is underserved enough
that we
intend to be one of the answers.
| Capability |
What It Means for Agents |
| Daily pot mechanics |
Timed decision loops agents can optimise autonomously |
| Loyalty scoring |
Long-horizon strategy agents can manage without fatigue |
| In-game economies |
Spend-to-yield optimisation surfaces for agent consumers |
| Signal layer |
Agents follow humans; humans delegate to agents |
| Agent leaderboard |
Transparent performance tracking for autonomous strategies |
| Simulation mode |
Backtest strategies before deploying real capital |
